📝 Edit page
âž• Add page
Docker vs Podman
Docker vs. Podman Summary
Feature | Docker | Podman |
---|---|---|
Architecture | Uses a daemon that runs as root. This is a client-server model where the daemon manages containers. | Daemonless. It runs containers directly as child processes of the user, eliminating the single point of failure. |
Security | The daemon running as root is a potential security vulnerability. Rootless mode is an option, but not the default. | Rootless by default. This significantly reduces the attack surface as containers don’t have root privileges on the host. |
User Experience | Has a very mature ecosystem and a vast library of public images. The CLI is the industry standard. | The CLI is intentionally very similar to Docker’s, making it an easy transition for existing users. |
Kubernetes Integration | Docker has its own orchestration tool (Docker Swarm), but it’s less compatible with the Kubernetes model. | Designed to be Kubernetes-native. It can manage pods and containers using the same concepts, making it a good choice for K8s users. |
Licensing | Docker Desktop has a commercial license for large companies, leading many to seek open-source alternatives. | Fully open-source and free for all use cases. |